HMRC Faced with Record Number of Calls for Judicial Reviews
Written by: Keith Tully
Date: Friday 30th June, 2017
An unprecedented number of applications were made for judicial reviews against HMRC during 2016, according to the London-based law firm RPC.
A total of 90 such reviews were called for over the course of last year, which represents an increase from 76 in 2015 and from just 42 in 2014.
RPC has suggested that the increase is a consequence of HMRC’s use of Accelerated Payment Notices (APNs), which effectively demand upfront payment of disputed tax amounts within 90 days.
Recipients of APNs can be either businesses or individuals, with many having been contractors from within the IT and medical professions.
According to RPC, the rise in the number of calls for judicial review raises questions about whether HMRC has been misusing the powers afforded to it as a tax-gathering organisation via APN mechanisms.
APNs are designed to function as a means of helping HMRC cut down on tax avoidance among individuals and businesses operating in the UK but their use over the past few years has been controversial.
As many as 70,000 APNs have been issued in recent years and HMRC says they have been responsible for bringing in more than £3 billion.
RPC says that the amounts of money involved in cases being disputed through calls for judicial review vary from small scale disputes involving individuals and much larger scale cases involving big businesses.
“HMRC has a duty to act fairly and lawfully, but more and more taxpayers are finding that it is falling short of the mark,” said Adam Craggs, a partner and head of tax disputes with RPC.
“With the new powers it has gained in the last few years, it is important that HMRC exercises its powers in a reasonable manner.”
A spokesperson for HMRC said in a statement: “Accelerated payments have changed the economics of tax avoidance by requiring those under investigation for tax avoidance to pay the disputed tax upfront, putting them in the same position as the majority of taxpayers who pay first and dispute later.”
“HMRC has won all five judicial reviews decided by the courts on the accelerated payments regime,” the spokesperson added.
Author
Keith Tully
Partner
Keith has been involved in Business Rescue since 1992, during which time he’s worked for both independent and national firms. His specialties include company restructuring matters and negotiating with HMRC on his clients behalf.
If You've Enjoyed This Article or Found it Interesting, 'Please Share it' With the Rest of the World!
News
Which retailers have been hit hardest in the last five years?
5th April 2018 Real Business Rescue recalls some iconic high street names which have unfortunately deserted us in recent years. How many can you remember? And who might be next?
Owner of Bargain Booze on the Brink of Administration
29th March 2018 The group which owns Bargain Booze is on the brink of entering administration after failing to raise the emergency funds required to resolve a severe cash flow crisis.
Government outlines plans to crackdown on directors behaving badly
29th March 2018 The government has outlined a series of proposals that it hopes will help to tighten up rules around corporate governance in insolvency scenarios throughout the UK.
West Ham United Co-owner ‘Used Club to Avoid Paying £700,000 in Taxes’
28th March 2018 David Sullivan, the co-owner of West Ham United, has been adjudged at a tribunal to have used the football club to avoid paying £700,000 in taxes. The matter relates to a £2 million transfer of funds
Carpetright Looking to Close Stores as Bosses Consider CVA Rescue Plan
22nd March 2018 Carpetright is looking to close some of its most unprofitable stores as it considers entering a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) rescue deal to avoid becoming the next British high street retailer
Every day we help companies just like yours turn things around against seemingly impossible odds, regardless of your situation we can help. Find your nearest office today.
